What is a four-day week?

A trial of a four-day week for colleagues at the Council has taken place, having started in January 2023. The model we have been working to is when people deliver 100% of their work, in around 80% of their hours (or pro rata for part time colleagues), for 100% of their pay. There is evidence that working a four-day week means people got more done in less time.

Some private sector businesses who work a four-day week choose to close for one whole day during the week - usually a Friday. This is not what the Council is doing because we are maintaining our full opening hours so that they are at least the same as they were before the trial. You can continue to contact us on any day of the week that you choose.

Whilst we are working in this way, Council officers are being asked not to take on any additional paid work on their non-working day. We have found that colleagues are using their non-working day in a variety of ways, including caring responsibilities, volunteering, and their personal health and wellbeing. 

Why did we trial a four-day week?

The main reasons we trialled the four-day week include:

• To help us attract and keep talented colleagues in an incredibly competitive local employment market.
• So we can improve our services by filling vacant posts permanently, rather than relying on more expensive agency staff. Regularly changing staff, or using agency staff to cover posts, is both costly and disruptive to services for residents. For example, when case officers change during the process of a planning application, it can cause delays and frustration because a lot of context and institutional memory is lost.
• To reduce costs.There was a financial assessment of the trial, which outlined a known full year cost saving of £371,500. This was mainly due to permanently filling 10 posts that were previously identified as ‘hard to fill’. The financial saving reduced the Council’s budget overspend because of not needing more expensive agency alternatives to fill the 10 posts.

The decision-making process

• Decisions on the initial three-month trial, and subsequently extending the trial for a year, were made by Cabinet.
• At a meeting of the Council’s Cabinet on Monday 12 September 2022, Cabinet Members agreed to proceed with an initial three-month trial.
• At the Cabinet meeting on Monday 15 May 2023, Cabinet members agreed to extend the trial for 12 months after independently-analysed data showed the first trial had been a success. At that Cabinet meeting, Members also agreed for waste crews to take part in a trial. The four-day bin collection pattern will continue until Councillors have decided on the next steps.
• There have been regular updates regarding the trial at our Employment and Staffing Committee meetings.
• A report was published on 21 February 2024 outlining the proposed next steps for the Council's four-day week. This was discussed at an Employment and Staffing Committee meeting on 29 February 2024. The report was then agreed at our Cabinet meeting on 12 March 2024 and Cambridge City Council's Strategy and Resources Scrutiny Committee on 25 March 2024. The report confirmed four-day week working continues until further information was provided by Government.
• A report to consider the data gathered from the full trial, until 31 March 2024, was presented to a meeting of our Employment and Staffing Committee on Monday 15 July 2024. The report was also discussed at a Full Council meeting on Thursday 18 July 2024. You can read our news summary.
• During the Local Government Finance Settlement consultation for 2024/25, which was published in December 2023, the previous Government consulted on the potential of using financial levers, to come into force from April 2025, to discourage councils from adopting four-day weeks. Until there was more clarity on this, Cabinet members considered it not feasible for the Council to carry out a meaningful consultation and decide on next steps.
• The new Government’s Local Government Finance Settlement for 2025/26, which was published on 18 December 2024, made no mention of any financial levers that were threatened by the previous Government. This means that the Council is now able to consult.
• A report outlining the Council's proposed approach to this consultation was discussed at January 2025's Scrutiny and Overview Committee. A Decision Notice was then published and the public consultation began at 9am on Monday 27 January 2025 and ended at 11:59pm on Sunday 23 March 2025. Now the consultation has ended, the responses have been collated. The responses will now be analysed independently by market research company DJS Research, who will then produce a report on their findings.
• The information gathered during the consultation will help District Councillors decide on the next steps for the four-day week at the Council. Once the Council has this information, we will publish this report on our website and it will be discussed at a public committee meeting where a decision will be made.
• The Council's Chief Executive has been undertaking a Doctorate in Business Administration relating to the four-day week in the public sector, which she started during 2020. As mentioned above, the decision-maker for the initial three-month and subsequent year-long trial was Cabinet. As this is the case, legal advice stated that the Chief Executive's Doctorate did not need to be declared. In addition, the qualification is 100% self-funded and carried out in the Chief Executive's own time. 

Expired Best Value Notice

The Council received a Best Value Notice [PDF, 0.8MB] from the then Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities on Friday 3 November 2023. It related to the Council's four-day week trial. An Extraordinary Meeting was held on Monday 20 November 2023 to discuss the Best Value Notice. The data that the Council submitted to Government as part of that process is available to view.

The Council received a second Best Value Notice [PDF, 0.1MB] from the then Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities on Wednesday 8 May 2024. This extended the Notice for a further six months.

On Friday 8 November 2024, the Government's newly-named Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government wrote to the Council to say that the Best Value Notice had expired and would not be reissued. The letter [PDF, 0.1MB] said that "...we recognise that local authorities are independent employers who are rightly responsible for the management and organisation of their own workforces."

Analysis of data from the trial

An independent report by two universities - into our performance during the four-day week trial - was published in July 2024. Of 24 key performance indicators monitored by the Council, analysis by the Universities of Cambridge and Salford found 22 improved or remained the same. You can find out more about the development of this report on our website.

Eleven measures were performing better during the trial, compared to beforehand. This covers areas such as call answering times, timeliness of planning decisions, how long it takes to process benefits claims and speed of emergency repairs to Council homes.

A further 11 key performance indicators showed no significant differences during the trial – meaning those services continued to be delivered to the quality they were previously. The frequency of bin collections has also remained the same.

The two areas that were exceptions in terms of performance during the trial period were housing rent collected and average days to re-let housing stock. Housing rent collected either hit or was just below the Council’s target in the 15 months of the trial. However, overall collection rates were below the long-term average, indicating that rent collection has not recovered to pre-Covid levels. The assumption is that this is likely due to the impact of the cost-of-living crisis on tenants' household finances.

Meanwhile, the target for the average number of days taken to re-let Council homes is very ambitious at 17 days. The top 25 per cent performing Councils in the country average 37 days to relet Council houses. In 2022/23 the average turnaround time for South Cambridgeshire District Council was 28 days; in 2023/24 it was 30 days. Returned Council homes now also often require extensive works which take longer to complete.

If we can be more productive on a four-day week schedule why can’t we be more productive but still work five days?

Working a four-day week is very different from working a five-day week. It is more intense – it has to be, in order to complete 100% of the work in 80% of the time. Many people will have experiences of the end of their week being less productive than the beginning. In a four-day week, we expect the end of the week to be just as productive as the beginning – but we know that this level of intensity does mean the longer weekend is really required to recover and re-energise ready for the next week. Trials of a four-day week are going on elsewhere, and our trial is testing this theory for us.

What we have also found with the four-day week trial so far is that employees have become more committed to the organisation, and their intention to stay with us has increased. This increases our productivity by reducing turnover costs – we can be more consistent in delivering services because we don’t waste time recruiting and training new colleagues. Before the four-day week trial this wasn’t the case – we had high turnover especially in some key service areas.

Some people think we should be able to be as productive over five days as we are over four. This is a bit like saying people running a marathon should run at the same speed as people running a sprint race – we know that’s not physically possible. It’s the same with a four-day week. The key for us is that all of the work is delivered, in 80% of the time. People feel more committed and so their motivation is higher. The office is open five days a week (and a little longer than usual on Wednesday evenings).

We don’t know whether the positive signs we have seen from the trial so far will be sustained – but that is part of the reason for a longer trial as it is evidence-led.