11 Performance Indicators - Important Corporate Matters

11.1 Performance Indicators - Important Corporate Matters

The following performance indicators, which do not relate directly to our three priorities, are still of corporate importance and we will be monitoring progress with quarterly reports to Management Team and Cabinet.

To assist the reader this set of PIs are out in Tables 24 to 32 under the following sub-headings.

Table Number

Table Title

Table Number

Table Title

24

Performance Management & Corporate Health

29

Community Safety & Community Services

25

Income, Finance & Efficiency

30

Housing Provision

26

Satisfaction with Services & Service Delivery

31

A Better Future through Partnership

27

Quality of Service

32

A Sustainable Future for South Cambridgeshire

28

Cleaner Villages & Environmental Quality

  

  


 

Table 24 - Performance Management & Corporate Health

#

PI Description

Past Performance

Future Targets

04/05

05/06

06/07

07/08

08/09

Target

Actual

Upper Quartile

Target

Actual

Target

Target

Target

Performance Management

BV12

Working days lost to sickness per FTE employee

8

13.1

8.48

11

10.75

10.5

10

9.5

SX27

% of BV PIs in top quartile

  

32%

  

40%

Note 1

42%

45%

50%

SX28

% of BV PIs which have improved

  

64%

  

45%

54%

60%

62%

65%

SX29

% of BV and Local PIs which have improved (Note 2)

  

62%

  

55%

52%

58%

60%

65%

SX32

% of BV PIs which have worsened (Note 2)

  

27%

  

25%

30%

20%

17.5%

15%

SX33

% of BV and Local PIs which have worsened (Note 2)

  

27%

  

20%

35%

17.5%

15%

12.5%

Corporate Health

SF713

Average spending on training per employee

£400

£347

  

£400

£250

£450

£450

£450

SF714

% staff who think Council is good employer to work for

80%

80%

  

2 yearly

  

83%

2 yearly

88%

SF715

% councillors attending at least one training session (Note 3)

80%

85%

  

85%

61.4%

68%

72%

78%

SX5

% employees leaving voluntarily

12%

8.1%

  

10%

10.1%

13%

13%

12%

SX20

% staff with completed staff appraisal (Note 4)

100%

97%

  

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Note 1: SX27 - This data will not be available until the DCLG publishes the national comparative information in December 2006.

Note 2: SX29, 32 & 33 – These figures may change once the data has been audited in September 2006.

Note 3:  SF715 - The 05/06 target was not achieved as the budget was cut from £11,560 to £5,560 due to capping.

Note 4: SX20 - Some appraisals were not completed on time, due to workload and restructuring pressures. The deadline was extended to 31st May for 2006 only.

 

Table 25 - Income, Finance & Efficiency

#

PI Description

Past Performance

Future Targets

04/05

05/06

06/07

07/08

08/09

Target

Actual

Upper Quartile

Target

Actual

Target

Target

Target

BV9

% Council Tax collected

99.2%

98.3%

98.5%

98.6%

98.3%

98.8%

99%

99.2%

BV10

% non-domestic rates received

99%

98.5%

99.2%

98.8%

98.5%

99%

99.2%

99.4%

BV66a

% rent collected

99%

97.4%

98.74%

98%

97.29%

98%

98.3%

98.5%

BV66b

% tenants with more than 7 weeks arrears

  

  

New 5/6

Not set

6.03%

5.5%

5.5%

4.5%

BV66c

% arrears tenants with Notices Seeking Possession served

  

  

New 5/6

Not set

20.18%

30%

25%

20%

BV66d

% tenants evicted due to arrears

  

  

New 5/6

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

BV76a

Benefit claimants visited per 1,000 caseload (Note 5)

375

410.75

296.6

415

421

400

400

400

BV76b

Fraud investigators employed per 1,000 caseload (Note 5)

0.3

0.19

No data

0.19

0.18

0.17

0.17

0.17

BV76c

Fraud investigations per 1,000 caseload

60

59.67

59.53

45

43.91

44

44

44

BV76d

Prosecutions/sanctions per 1,000 caseload

4

7.51

6.25

7.5

10.09

10

10

10

BV79a

% cases where benefit calculation was correct

100%

98.8%

99%

99.1%

98%

99%

99%

99%

BV79bi

% overpayment recovered excl: Council Tax. (was BV79b)

62%

65.71%

53.59%

Not set

51%

52.5%

53%

53.5%

BV79bii

% Housing Benefit overpayments recovered

  

  

New 5/6

Not set

28.04%

29%

29.5%

30%

BV79biii

% Housing Benefit overpayments written off

  

  

New 5/6

Not set

3.27%

3%

3%

3%

SF706

Percentile (%) position in the CIPFA benchmarking group for rate of return on investments.

New 4/5

99%
Note 1

  

Note 2

Note 3

Note 2

Note 2

Note 2

SF707

% variation GF outturn and the original Budget (Note 4)

<3%

4.7%

  

<3%

10%

<3%

<3%

<3%

SX17

Income (£'s) from other funding agencies as result of the Community Services capital grants programme

100,000

131,481

  

105,000

195,229

150,000

160,000

170,000

Note 1: SF706 - South Cambridgeshire achieved an 04/05 rate of return of 4.84%, which resulted in our being second out of a group of 139 authorities that reported to CIPFA. The rate of return for the 139 authorities ranged from 4.45% to 4.92% and the average was 4.65%.

Note 2: SF706 - The annual target is "to achieve a greater return than the CIPFA average over a 5-year rolling period".

Note 3: SF706 - The actual is not known as it depends on the CIPFA benchmarking group performance, which will not be known until late in 2006.

Note 4: SF707 - The Council’s 05/06 budget was substantially reduced from the original because of capping.

Note 5: BV76a/b – The number of claimants visited per 1,000 caseload is expected to reduce due to an increasing caseload.

 

Table 26 - Satisfaction with Services & Service Delivery

#

PI Description

Past Performance

Future Targets

04/05

05/06

06/07

07/08

08/09

Target

Actual

Upper Quartile

Target

Actual

Target

Target

Target

Satisfaction with Services

BV111

% planning applicants satisfied

  

  

81%

  

  

80%

  

  

SE223

% pest control customers satisfied with the service

90%

93%

  

93%

85%

91%

91%

92%

SE226

% satisfied with the way their EH request was handled

92%

89%

  

92%

82%

92%

93%

93%

SH328

% tenants who returned slip, satisfied with refurbishments

  

  

New 5/6

90%

91%

92%

94%

95%

SP908

% satisfaction of listed building applicants

90%

90%

  

90%

90%

90%

90%

90%

SX4

% satisfied with how they can contact the Council

  

58%

  

  

  

65%

  

  

Service Delivery

BV212

Average days to re-let council houses (was SH308)

35

38

No data

30

29

21

19

17

SE224

% missed collections put right within time limits - was SE200

  

85%

New 5/6

95%

100%

100%

100%

100%

SE225

% pest control first treatments within 4 working days

80%

90%

  

90%

85%

83%

85%

87%

SH301

% non-urgent repairs completed in time

90%

90%

  

92%

83%

93%

94%

95%

SH309

% urgent repairs completed within government time limits

95%

93%

  

96%

96%

96%

96%

96%

SH310

Average calendar days to complete non-urgent response repairs

24

20

  

20

17

16

15

14

SH316

% homelessness applications processed within 33 working days

85%

90.6%

  

92%

85.6%

End 6/7

  

  

SP902

% Planning decisions delegated to officers

90%

90%

  

90%

90%

90%

95%

95%

SP921

% of household planning applications within 8 weeks

75%

87%

  

87%

87%

90%

90%

90%

SP925

% building control applications decided within relevant period

  

  

New 5/6

90%

99%

99%

99%

99%

SX25

Average days to respond to standard search, received by post

8

8

  

8

8

4

3

3

 


Table 27 - Quality of Service

#

PI Description

Past Performance

Future Targets

04/05

05/06

06/07

07/08

08/09

Target

Actual

Upper Quartile

Target

Actual

Target

Target

Target

BV204

% appeals allowed against planning application refusals

36%

18.5%

24%

36%

28.6%

36%

36%

36%

BV205

Score against a planning quality of service checklist

New 4/5

94.4%

88.9%

90%

90%

90%

90%

90%

SE201

Collections missed per 100,000 collections of household waste

50

77

  

50

45

50

45

40

SH327

% repairs where appointment was made & kept (Note 1)

90%

88%

  

92%

94%

94%

95%

96%

Note 1: BV185 - This was a national PI (BV185) up to 04/05. It was renumbered and retained as a valued local PI.

 

Table 28 - Cleaner Villages & Environmental Quality

#

PI Description

Past Performance

Future Targets

04/05

05/06

06/07

07/08

08/09

Target

Actual

Upper Quartile

Target

Actual

Target

Target

Target

Cleaner Villages

BV199a

% land/highways with combined deposits/litter and detritus

35%

35%

10%

33%

30%

29%

29%

29%

BV199b

% relevant land/highways with unacceptable graffiti visible

  

  

New 5/6

Not set

6%

6%

5%

5%

BV199c

% relevant land/highways with unacceptable visible fly-posting

  

  

New 5/6

Not set

3%

3%

3%

3%

BV199d

Reduction in fly-tipping incidents and increase in enforcement (Note 1)

  

  

New 5/6

Not set

1

1

1

1

Environmental Quality

BV216a

Land contamination 'sites of potential concern'

  

  

New 5/6

Not set

551

540

540

540

BV216b

% of sites for which sufficient detailed information is available to decide whether remediation of the land is necessary

  

  

New 5/6

Not set

9%

15%

21%

27%

BV219a

Total number of conservation areas

  

  

New 5/6

84

84

85

86

86

BV219b

% conservation areas with up-to-date character appraisal

  

  

New 5/6

10.71%

10.71%

16.47%

22.09%

27%

BV219c

% conservation areas with published management proposals

  

  

New 5/6

10.71%

10.71%

16.47%

22.09%

27%

SP903

% buildings taken off buildings at risk register

8%

15%

  

8%

3%

6%

6%

7%

SP904

Historic buildings improved as result of LA action

15

30

  

22

21

15

16

17

SP905

Metres hedges/hedgerow trees created with LA support

4,000

4,000

  

4,200

4,200

4,400

4,600

4,700

SP931

Landscape schemes implemented

  

  

New 5/6

70

39

72

74

76

Note 1: BV199d - There are 4 possible scores (i.e. 1 , 2, 3 or 4). 1 is the highest achievable and is otherwise scored as 'Very Effective'. This score indicates that this authority has 'decreased the number of incidents of fly-tipping and increased the number of enforcement actions'.

 

Table 29 - Community Safety & Community Services

#

PI Description

Past Performance

Future Targets

04/05

05/06

06/07

07/08

08/09

Target

Actual

Upper Quartile

Target

Actual

Target

Target

Target

Community Safety

BV218a

% abandoned vehicle new reports investigated within 24 hours

  

  

New 5/6

85%

76%

85%

85%

87%

BV218b

% abandoned vehicles removed within 24 hours of when LA legally entitled to remove the vehicle

  

  

New 5/6

80%

85%

85%

85%

87%

BV225

Actions against domestic violence (Replaces BV176)

  

  

New 5/6

Not set

54.5%

91%

91%

91%

SX7

% feeling safe outside during the day (Note 1)

  

  

  

95%

93%

  

95%

  

SX8

% feeling safe outside at night (Note 1)

  

  

  

73%

64%

  

73%

  

SX9

% feeling safe alone in home after dark (Note 1)

  

  

  

88%

84%

  

88%

  

Community Services

SX10

Under 18's in Active Sports Programme

1,300

4,000

  

3,500

Note 2

  

  

  

SX11

Teams entering Youth debating competition

15

10

  

12

Note 2

  

  

  

SX12

% Arts Strategy action plan implemented

95%

95%

  

Not set

Note 2

  

  

  

SX13

% Sports Strategy action plan implemented

Not set

Not set

  

Not set

Note 2

  

  

  

SX14

% Community Development Strategy implemented

  

98%

  

Not set

Note 2

  

  

  

SX15

% Dual Use Strategy work completed

33%

44%

  

66%

66%

88%

100%

100%

Note 1: SX7, 8 & 9 – These are identified from 2-yearly surveys carried out Countywide.

Note 2: SX10 to 14Following budget cuts these PIs have been deleted and will be replaced as part of the work to agree a joint Arts, Sports and Community Services Strategy.

 

Table 30 - Housing Provision

#

PI Description

Past Performance

Future Targets

04/05

05/06

06/07

07/08

08/09

Target

Actual

Upper Quartile

Target

Actual

Target

Target

Target

BV183a

Weeks in B&B of relevant homeless households – Note 1

4

4

1

3

5

3

2

2

BV183b

Average weeks in hostels of relevant homeless households

30

29

Nil

28

29

24

20

16

BV184a

% council houses which were non-decent at 1st April 2004

20%

20%

17%

11%

10%

5%

2%

0%

BV184b

% change of non-decent council houses at 31 Mar 2005

50%

48.1%

No data

79%

63.8%

50%

50%

0%

BV203

% annual change in average number of families in temporary accommodation under homelessness legislation

New 4/5

9.13%

- 9.4%

0%

- 3.14%

-5%

-5%

-5%

BV213

Homelessness cases prevented per thousand households

  

  

New 5/6

Not set

1%

1%

1%

1%

BV214

% households accepted as homeless who were previously accepted as homeless

  

  

New 5/6

3%

2.4%

2%

2%

2%

Note 1: BV183a The national standard for 05/06 and again for 06/07 is to achieve a performance of ‘under 6 weeks’.

 

Table 31 - A Better Future through Partnership

#

PI Description

Past Performance

Future Targets

04/05

05/06

06/07

07/08

08/09

Target

Actual

Upper Quartile

Target

Actual

Target

Target

Target

BV226a

Spend on advice/guidance services provided by external organisations (Replaces BV177)

  

  

New 5/6

  

Nil

Not set

Not set

Not set

BV226b

% spent on advice/guidance service given to organisations with CLS Quality Mark at "General Help" level and above

  

  

New 5/6

  

Nil

Not set

Not set

Not set

BV226c

Spend on advice/guidance in housing, welfare benefits and consumer matters, provided directly by LA to the public (00’s).

  

  

New 5/6

  

£170.80 Note 1

Not set

Not set

Not set

SF710

% satisfied they can influence local decisions (Note 2)

  

  

  

25%

17%

  

33%

  

SH302

% Tenants satisfied with response repairs

90%

89%

  

91%

95%

95%

95%

95%

SX1

% turnout for local elections (Note 3)

36%

45.16%

  

68%

68.57%

40%

41%

42%

SX2

% households returning annual canvas form

96%

96.4%

  

96.5%

95.8%

96%

96.5%

97%

SX3

% residents who feel the council lets them know what it is doing and listens to their concerns (Note 4)

  

 70%

  

  

  

72%

  

  

SX16

Villages with completed Parish plans

8

8

  

10

16

20

24

28

Note 1: BV226c – The actual estimated figure is £170,830. This is based on a proportion of the total salary budget for the Housing Advice and Homelessness section. We are required to supply an estimate of staff time spent on giving Homelessness Advice. The data will not be subject to audit.

Note 2. SF710 – Obtained through the countywide 2-yearly Quality of Life Survey.

Note 3: SX1 - Local elections will take place in a third of the district in 2006 and 2007. The scope for publicity is reduced for these localised elections and turnout is likely to be relatively low.

Note 4: SX3 – Data is obtained from a 3-yearly national survey and the 04/05 figure is the 03/04 actual.

 

Table 32 - A Sustainable Future for South Cambridgeshire

#

PI Description

Past Performance

Future Targets

04/05

05/06

06/07

07/08

08/09

Target

Actual

Upper Quartile

Target

Actual

Target

Target

Target

BV8

% undisputed invoices paid within 30 days

100%

92.42%

97%

98%

95.21%

97%

97%

97%

BV63

Average SAP rating of council houses

62%

62%

67%

65%

65%

66%

67%

69%

BV82ai

% tonnage of household waste recycled

17.8%

17.8%

19.35%

18%

18.1%

19%

20%

21%

BV82aii

Tonnage household waste sent for recycling

  

9,850

New 5/6

10,000

10,615

10,700

11,200

11,600

BV82bi

% household waste composted or anaerobicly digested

22.3%

29%

10.56%

30%

31.3%

31%

32%

34%

BV82bii

Tonnes household waste composted or anaerobicly digested

  

16,100

New 5/6

17,000

18,330

18,000

18,200

18,600

BV84a

Kgms household waste collected per head

374

422.1

380.8

433

434.2

440

445

450

BV84b

% change in kilograms household waste collected per head

  

22.3%

New 5/6

1.1%

2.87%

1.34%

1.14%

1.12%

BV91a

% served by one recyclable kerbside collection

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

BV91b

% served by two recyclable kerbside collection

  

100%

New 5/6

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

BV106

% new homes built on previously developed land

37%

32.7%

90.1%

27%

33%

37%

37%

37%

BV200a

Did the authority submit the Local Development Scheme (LDS) by 28th March 2005? (amended 05/06)

Yes

Yes

51% Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

BV200b

Has the authority met the LDS milestones? (amended 05/06)

Yes

N/A

69% Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

BV200c

Did authority publish monitoring report by December?

  

  

New 5/6

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

SP901

Hectares of local nature reserve per 1,000 population

6.76

6.76

  

6.78

10.59

10.8

11

11.2

SX21

% SCDC single car users (Note 1)

49%

68%

  

49%

64%

60%

55%

49%

Note 1: SX21 - As part of the move to Cambourne the agreed planning permission required the authority to achieve a target of 49%.

 

Back to Top